Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
There is a lot of talk about limiting winning accounts in the industry. Probably every player has experienced this. With many bookmakers, low stakes and low winnings are enough to get ridiculous limits of €1, for example. This makes such an account useless. In any case, the pattern is simple. Winnings equal limits.
And how does it look with bet brokers (and possibly sharp bookmakers/exchanges)? It is clear that this is a different type of betting and they allow a lot. The limits and winnings are many times higher than at recreational bookmakers. I bet with brokers myself, precisely for better limits, because I had restrictions at various bookmakers. I would describe my stakes as average.
Of course, they allow for much more. But I know that there are players who bet really large amounts and make good profits. I find it hard to believe that with brokers, you can win endlessly and also encounter some problems and limits. However, the pattern here seems more complex. So what is the situation with limits with brokers? Could this be a real problem for big players?
Posted : 07/01/2026 4:15 am
Without brokers, serious betting is out of the question in today's market reality. A regular bookmaker will not allow even a small percentage of what a bet broker allows in terms of stakes. Not to mention arbitrage betting, trading, etc. Although there are also bookmakers who are useful, but as a supplement to agent accounts and not separately.
I have been betting this way for a long time and have had no problems, nor have I heard of any limits per player. For a specific bet, followed by a reduction in odds, yes, but that is clear from the start. But in general, even though there is no problem even with high and very high stakes, I find it hard to believe that everything is without limits. I haven't figured it out, but I don't know what it would be like if someone won millions a month for years.
Posted : 21/01/2026 10:46 am
Topic starter
Without brokers, serious betting is out of the question in today's market reality. A regular bookmaker will not allow even a small percentage of what a bet broker allows in terms of stakes. Not to mention arbitrage betting, trading, etc. Although there are also bookmakers who are useful, but as a supplement to agent accounts and not separately.
Well, that's obvious. Bet brokers allow much more, everyone knows that. But there has to be a ceiling somewhere. Theoretically, because there are limits on bets and the odds are lowered once they are filled, sharp bettors are safe. For liquid markets, such as the Spanish and English leagues, I guess the ceiling is very high, maybe so high that no one can reach it. But do dynamic odds work for less popular markets? If one player bets a lot, even despite odds falling on one side, and there is no equivalent on the other side? Then it seems that the ceiling is much lower.
I have no problem with this, and I bet a lot, I'm just thinking out loud because I'm interested in this topic. And it's good to be prepared for such a possible problem in the future.
Posted : 31/01/2026 3:54 pm
Share:
SEARCH THE FORUMS
DISCUSSIONS
BET BROKERS
Lifetime cashback of 0.1% on the Edge platform. Very wide range of offers.
Go to Madmarket
The largest broker on the market. Lots of options. Instant withdrawals.
Go to BetInAsia
The first broker in the industry, since 2002. Fast payments. High security.
Go to Asianconnect
TOPIC PREFIXES
TAGS
RELATED RESOURCES
FORUM.BROKER © All rights Reserved